Branch Secretary :

Access to Justice: Exposing the Myths

Stacks the odds in favour of the employer

A new publication from the Institute of Employment Rights demolishes the saloon bar myths disseminated by neoliberal politicians, employers’ organisations, and the right-wing press on workers’ access to justice. It shows that the system stacks the odds in favour of the employer, not, as is so often claimed, in favour of the worker.


In contrast to the arguments of the myth makers, the arguments presented are backed by reference to tribunal and court cases, and to reports and surveys published by Government departments and academics.


Despite the big pay outs publicised in the press, the overwhelming majority of awards are remarkably small, rarely even begin to compensate the worker for the loss sustained, and an astounding proportion are never paid.


Re-instatement, the primary remedy for unfair dismissal, has effectively been abandoned. Acas conciliation serves largely to allow employers to dispose of those few cases with the potential to prove expensive quickly and cheaply – and without embarrassing publicity - confident that the worker is unlikely to risk the expensive gamble of a tribunal hearing.


Individual legal employment rights, it is argued, were intended to compliment, not replace, the negotiating strength of organised labour. Now, perhaps more than ever in the past 100 years, there is a necessity for every worker to join an effective and independent trade union in order to win back the freedoms and rights lost since 1979.


This is the second in the IER’s series of Mythbusters, the first of which - the Mythology of Business - saw David Whyte explain how some of the most common arguments in favor of neoliberalism (such as the “trickle-down effect” or “health and safety gone mad”) are being used to mislead the public.


Both Mythbusters are now available for just £6 each for trade union members here.


Cross posted from Unite for our Society


Before Posting

We welcome debate and discussion on our website, but we also want an open, respectful, inclusive space in which forms of abuse or personal attack will not be tolerated. Comments will be moderated and will be removed if they are found to be unduly offensive. You should also be very careful in posting information about your employer. Employers do visit the website and if you think a comment could get you into trouble for releasing confidential or sensitive information, or for bringing the employer into disrepute, please do not post it. It remains your individual responsibility to ensure that what you post is appropriate. Please therefore just give a moment's thought to what you are saying. The types of comments that are likely to be moderated are:

  • Personal abuse or attacks on an individual.
  • Information which breaches another person's right to confidentiality.
  • The use of offensive language, including swear words, or language which is racist, sexist, or otherwise breaches equalities standards.
  • Anything that might place the Branch or the wider union in legal jeopardy.
  • Adverts or information which is posted for commercial gain.

* Name
* Email (will not be published)
* field is required