Branch Secretary :

Alarm bells ring over future of housing staff pensions

Unite has issued this statement today 30 July 2015


The increased contributions to the pension fund for social housing staff should not be used as an excuse for housing association bosses to provide inferior pension provision for employees.

Unite, the country’s largest union, fears that housing association executives will opt for less generous pension schemes, following the latest contribution increases that associations pay into the Social Housing Pension Scheme (SHPS). The SHPS is currently grappling with a £1.32bn deficit.

Unite, which has 10,000 members in the housing sector, reiterated its commitment “to fight for good quality pensions that will provide a decent income for our housing members in their retirement”.

Unite national officer for the not for profit sector Sally Kosky said: “Alarm bells are certainly ringing that the SHPS deficit could kick-start a trend where employees are moved from a defined benefit (DB) scheme to a defined contribution or ‘money purchase’ scheme, which relies on the vagaries of the stock market as to what you may get on retirement.


“The employers have a choice on how to respond and we don’t want the defined benefit schemes closed, with the SHPS’ demand for increased contributions being used as an excuse for downgrading pension provision. We don’t want our members taking this financial hit, as housing association managements have been squeezing the pay and terms and conditions of our members for a number of years – enough is enough. While staff are having their living standards throttled, housing associations always seem to manage to increase CEO pay and pension pots very generously on an annual basis."

She added that:

“Housing associations continue to pile up record surpluses on a yearly basis, with growing assets and relatively low gearing in terms of borrowing costs. Unite is committed to maintaining DB schemes and we have been prepared to put that into action supporting groups of workers defending their pension. Penny-pinching bosses should not underestimate Unite’s determination to support our members in the fight to have a decent pension for their retirement.”

The nature of SHPS is that it allows employers a choice of different benefit options they can offer to their employees and a choice of what contributions they ask members to pay towards the cost of those options.

Basically, SHPS has increased the cost of all the DB options on that menu of choice – hence Unite’s concern about their future.


For more an earlier report on SHPS see here.

See a guide for Unite reps here.



Before Posting

We welcome debate and discussion on our website, but we also want an open, respectful, inclusive space in which forms of abuse or personal attack will not be tolerated. Comments will be moderated and will be removed if they are found to be unduly offensive. You should also be very careful in posting information about your employer. Employers do visit the website and if you think a comment could get you into trouble for releasing confidential or sensitive information, or for bringing the employer into disrepute, please do not post it. It remains your individual responsibility to ensure that what you post is appropriate. Please therefore just give a moment's thought to what you are saying. The types of comments that are likely to be moderated are:

  • Personal abuse or attacks on an individual.
  • Information which breaches another person's right to confidentiality.
  • The use of offensive language, including swear words, or language which is racist, sexist, or otherwise breaches equalities standards.
  • Anything that might place the Branch or the wider union in legal jeopardy.
  • Adverts or information which is posted for commercial gain.

* Name
* Email (will not be published)
* field is required