Branch Secretary :

Osborne eyes privatisation of stake in social housing

Osborne eyes privatisation of stake in social housing the splash headline in today’s Financial Times.  We have warned repeatedly of such a move. Unite housing workers will link with tenants and housing campaigners to stop the government.


According to the Financial Times, the plan is to sell off the government stake in housing associations.  The excuse is that the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has reclassified housing associations as public sector bodies.  When seen as private sector their borrowing was not counted as part of the public sector debt.  Reclassification would add about £60bn – not good for ‘deficit reduction’ propaganda.  The reality is that this has actually been long planned.  It would amount to one of the biggest privatisations so far. 



We have reported here that a report last year by the influential think tank Policy Exchange set out a plan for full privatisation of housing associations. And we need to note that the report was sponsored by Genesis, one the biggest housing associations and draws on discussion with Chief Executives of other big housing associations on Chatham House terms – that means secret talks'


In 2014 the net assets of housing associations stood at £133bn


In 2014 the net assets of housing associations stood at £133bn, of which taxpayers have contributed £44bn in capital grants during the past three decades. The treasury would get a windfall and investors would get access to the housing associations huge assets accumulated with public support.


The government – following Policy Exchange – apparently hope that with more debt and no grant, but ‘reinvented’ and ‘prepared to take more risks’, they will build more homes.  Experience suggests that fewer homes have been built as grant has been cut.  More borrowing will cost – and higher risks will increase the cost of their borrowing: that will mean higher rent and worse services for tenants and leaseholders.


Abadonment of social housing


Many housing association chiefs have publicly backed away from the naked commercialism typified by Genesis and by its boss’s planned abandonment of social housing.  Although his response quoted by Inside Housing that if only a third of associations admit to abandoning cheap rented housing “He suspects the other two thirds are ‘lying’”, has credibility. 


The National Housing Federation signed up to implement the governments ‘right to buy’ proposals arguing it would prevent the ONS reclassifying them.  They also bargained measures of deregulation that will make it easier to move away from a social role.  The effect of this agreement was to let the government avoid a Parliamentary debate.  In defence of this they claim that it was inevitable that the government would have won although The Spectators normally well informed political correspondent Isabel Hardman reported that the Tories would have faced a serious rebellion and could have won.  The minimum we can say is that no one should trust housing association ‘leaders’ to mount a serious defence of social housing although we are keen to work with groups such as Shout.


With the housing crisis at the top of the agenda the government plans would enrich their friends in the City at the expense of less genuinely affordable new housing.  Housing workers in Unite will want to join with our wider union and the broad movement against austerity to put forward a vision for social housing.  Jeremy Corbyn campaigned for a radical change in housing policy including a massive programme of council house building.  We look forward to working with him to fight these plans


Paul Kershaw, branch chair


For background see a recent article from Socialism Today here


Before Posting

We welcome debate and discussion on our website, but we also want an open, respectful, inclusive space in which forms of abuse or personal attack will not be tolerated. Comments will be moderated and will be removed if they are found to be unduly offensive. You should also be very careful in posting information about your employer. Employers do visit the website and if you think a comment could get you into trouble for releasing confidential or sensitive information, or for bringing the employer into disrepute, please do not post it. It remains your individual responsibility to ensure that what you post is appropriate. Please therefore just give a moment's thought to what you are saying. The types of comments that are likely to be moderated are:

  • Personal abuse or attacks on an individual.
  • Information which breaches another person's right to confidentiality.
  • The use of offensive language, including swear words, or language which is racist, sexist, or otherwise breaches equalities standards.
  • Anything that might place the Branch or the wider union in legal jeopardy.
  • Adverts or information which is posted for commercial gain.

* Name
* Email (will not be published)
* field is required