Branch Secretary :

Tories reduce winter homeless funding

£1 million less for cold weather shelters


The government announced £12 million of additional cold winter funding to support rough sleepers on 13 October. This will be nowhere near enough.



Some will go to councils in England to provide further self-contained accommodation, and the rest will go to community groups to provide ‘Covid-safe’ night shelters. But it is actually less than the £13 million the Tories gave to cold winter projects last year. This funding should be restored in full.


The fall should be no surprise. Despite the rhetoric, spending on homeless services is down by over half a billion a year since 2008-09, according to St Mungo’s and Homeless Link. Meanwhile, homelessness has soared.


Threat of redundancies


In our branch we have already begun to be aware of redundancies across the sector as local authorities decide to reduce funding levels, donation and grant levels drop and the effect of the recession begins to bite.  We will fight redundancies in homelessness workplaces.


And the toxic combination of rising unemployment, the end of the eviction ban, struggling public services, and insecure private rented housing is placing many more people at risk of homelessness this winter. Shelter estimated in July that 230,000 private renters were at risk of eviction when the ban lifted, because of arrears built up since the start of the pandemic.


With the right resources homelessness is preventable. The government’s ‘Everybody In’ scheme was one of the few positive initiatives to emerge from lockdown.


'Everbody in' edning


Almost 15,000 homeless people were placed in emergency accommodation, often in empty hotels. This had a real impact in preventing the spread of the virus and saving lives. The timely response avoided 266 deaths during the first wave, as well as 21,092 infections, 1,164 hospital admissions, and 338 intensive care admissions, according to a recent study in the Lancet.


I see the effect of this in my own role as a homelessness worker in central London. However, the ‘Everybody in’ scheme is now ending.


People who are new to the street have nowhere to go, with limited accommodation options. The normal support network of day centres, advice services and food banks is struggling to operate under coronavirus.


Requisition emty houses and hotels


Everyone should have the right to a decent, affordable home. There are over 200,000 empty properties in the UK, estimates the pressure group Action on Empty Homes.


The impact of coronavirus means that demand for hotel accommodation in cities is at a record low. An August study into hotel occupancy in London found an average of just 25%, with analyst STR reporting some as low as 10%.


As an immediate step, councils should requisition empty houses and hotels for homeless people. The government should declare that arrears accrued during the pandemic will be forgiven, with compensation to small landlords on the basis of proven need.


Combining these immediate measures with a programme for mass building of council housing, democratic rent controls, and full funding of homelessness services, we could properly tackle homelessness.


Jack Jeffery Unite houisng workers (LE1111) branch secretary.


See recent resolution on evictions here


October 20th 2020


Before Posting

We welcome debate and discussion on our website, but we also want an open, respectful, inclusive space in which forms of abuse or personal attack will not be tolerated. Comments will be moderated and will be removed if they are found to be unduly offensive. You should also be very careful in posting information about your employer. Employers do visit the website and if you think a comment could get you into trouble for releasing confidential or sensitive information, or for bringing the employer into disrepute, please do not post it. It remains your individual responsibility to ensure that what you post is appropriate. Please therefore just give a moment's thought to what you are saying. The types of comments that are likely to be moderated are:

  • Personal abuse or attacks on an individual.
  • Information which breaches another person's right to confidentiality.
  • The use of offensive language, including swear words, or language which is racist, sexist, or otherwise breaches equalities standards.
  • Anything that might place the Branch or the wider union in legal jeopardy.
  • Adverts or information which is posted for commercial gain.

* Name
* Email (will not be published)
* field is required