Branch Secretary : suz.muna.unite@gmail.com
  

St Mungo's Broadway Ballot for strike action

New swingeing cuts to pay, and changes to policies and procedures governing working conditions at housing charity St Mungo’s Broadway have prompted a strike ballot of more than 500 workers.

 

The staff, members of Unite, the country’s largest union, at the west London-based charity are currently being balloted for industrial action. The ballot closes on Tuesday 7 October.

 

The source of staff discontent is, according to Unite regional officer Nicky Marcus, ‘a bizarre coup d’état’ which has seen Broadway, a ‘struggling’ organisation of 200 employees making year on year deficits merging with the highly successful 1,000- strong St Mungo’s and to all intents and purposes taking it over completely.

 

The ‘merger’ has resulted in four of the seven new executive team including the chief executive and the director of HR coming from Broadway.

 

The new executive team have imposed sweeping changes to workers' terms and conditions without consulting or negotiating with the union.

 

Nicky Marcus said that the new bosses had given themselves the customary massive pay hikes, including £30,000 for the new chief executive Howard Sinclair,

 

She said: “They have slashed the pay of new starters by £5,000-a-year for a project worker, and for existing staff being restructured; taken pay out of collective bargaining; imposed new, draconian policies and procedures; and breached the recognition agreement with Unite repeatedly.

 

“Staff are furious. They are simply not prepared to stand by and watch the heart and soul being ripped out of their organisation; an organisation with a hard fought reputation built on quality - quality of services and quality of staff.

 

"Staff are, naturally concerned at the effect strike action will have on the vulnerable people within their care, but they are more concerned at the long-term profound, negative effects these changes will have on them.

 

“Cheap labour, downgraded roles, staff working under minimum standard policies and procedures are never a path to quality in social care.

 

“We urge the management to have a radical re-think of their current approach. They have exported an arrogant, controlling managerial style, downgraded policies, procedures, roles and pay rates from their own failing company to allegedly ‘secure the future’ of a highly successful, flourishing company with year on year surpluses and 10 per cent  growth last year.

 

“The logic of that beggars belief. They are about to transform a high quality organisation with a reputation second to none into yet another low quality, minimum standards, race to the bottom business.

 

“And to compound the arrogant attitude of the new management team, we haven't been presented with a single shred of evidence to suggest the financial necessity for any of what is being imposed.”

 

Union members have passed a vote of ‘no confidence’ in the new executive team to manage and lead the newly merged charity and are now voting on taking industrial action.

Comments :

Such a shame to see what Mungo's is coming to. I left 3 years ago amid ongoing restructuring which has not stopped since. Add to this what is taking place now and what was a job I loved is one I have no intention of returning to. I used to be proud of telling people I worked for St Mungo's, this is fast becoming a thing of the past. Management, what are you doing? You claim to be working for the vulnerable adults you house, how can this be if you are persecuting the staff that are there to support them. To increase your own salaries by such a disgusting amount while taking from the frontline staff is hardly progressive or fair. Time to think on what attracted you to the job in the first place! Equality???


By Drew Cummings on 2014-10-16 20:45:33

POST A COMMENT!

Before Posting

We welcome debate and discussion on our website, but we also want an open, respectful, inclusive space in which forms of abuse or personal attack will not be tolerated. Comments will be moderated and will be removed if they are found to be unduly offensive. You should also be very careful in posting information about your employer. Employers do visit the website and if you think a comment could get you into trouble for releasing confidential or sensitive information, or for bringing the employer into disrepute, please do not post it. It remains your individual responsibility to ensure that what you post is appropriate. Please therefore just give a moment's thought to what you are saying. The types of comments that are likely to be moderated are:


  • Personal abuse or attacks on an individual.
  • Information which breaches another person's right to confidentiality.
  • The use of offensive language, including swear words, or language which is racist, sexist, or otherwise breaches equalities standards.
  • Anything that might place the Branch or the wider union in legal jeopardy.
  • Adverts or information which is posted for commercial gain.

* Name
* Email (will not be published)
Website
Comment
* field is required

NEWS ARCHIVE