Branch Secretary :

Channel 4 expose Sanctuary - they are also attacking staff

We often point out that housing associations that treat staff badly also tend to treat their residendents badly. Channel Four Dispatches recently reported on Sanctuary Housing Group's failings towards tenants; our members in Greenwich care homes also feel badly treated.


Housing Association's Horrors Exposed


Many people viewed with horror the Channel 4 Dispatches programme on Monday night, with its images of mouldy walls, rotten windows, damp rooms, flooded light fittings, rotting floors and general disrepair. The programme, entitled ‘New Landlords from Hell’, alleged that Sanctuary Housing Group’s tenants were deliberately left to languish in homes not fit for purpose, with two cases highlighted in particular. One concerned a young child with a respiratory disease which his parents claimed had been caused by living with toxic mould and damp. Another described the tragic case of an old man left without heating during cold weather, leading, his son believes, to his death from a lung infection.


Boss's Salary of £350,000


The programme highlighted the outgoing CEO’s salary of £350K per year plus benefits, and the group’s £198m operating surplus in 2018. Affordability was therefore no excuse for the appalling disrepair. Instead, the programme blamed the association’s increasing disregard for housing those in need, its original social purpose, in favour of developing simply for sale to the highest bidder. This has generated a culture of disdain for tenants’ needs amongst its executive, most of whom are from the private and banking sectors.


See the programme here


But our members’ experiences testify that it is not only the tenants who are treated with contempt by the super-sized landlord. It is the staff too.


Sanctuary Care: Not Caring About Care Staff!


Sanctuary Care has started consulting its staff about an “Employment Offer” that displays staggering corporate hypocrisy towards hardworking staff caring for the most vulnerable in society. Their booklet boasts of how their staff have established Sanctuary as “a leading provider of quality care across England and Scotland”, but proposes a series of deep cuts to pay and conditions. It claims to want to ensure “the future attraction and retention of quality staff”, but intends to do this by making care homes less attractive places to work.


Unite members have agreed to fight these changes. Unite members say no to Sanctuary’s offer!


We heard our members’ horror stories at a packed meeting of Sanctuary members last week. The staff had transferred to the Sanctuary care homes from a London council, but the employer now wants to implement a downward harmonisation which involves reducing annual leave from 29 days to 20, cutting bank holiday payments, and extending the working week from 36 to 39 hours (equating to an additional 156 hours per year FTE with no extra pay). There are also proposals to cut other benefits, for example a free meal after working a 12 hour shift.


Most sickening of all, given the vulnerability of care home residents is the employer’s intention to reduce sick leave from six months on full-pay and six months on half-pay, to just three weeks on full-pay after two to five years’ service, and six weeks on full pay after five years’ service. Even this miserable offering will only kick in after the first 3 days. We can be sure that the Executive are not being ‘offered’ such stingy terms.


Changes Harm Residents As Well As Staff


These measures will harm the residents as well as the staff, driving out many of the more experienced, well-qualified workers who can most easily find alternative employment, forcing others to work when they are unwell, and increasing burn-out by reducing time off from physically and emotionally demanding work.


Instead of these unnecessary and draconian changes, Unite members demanded an upward harmonisation, with all staff transferred to the equivalent of the local government terms and conditions. They want paid breaks for all staff on all shifts, and a 10% pay rise across the board. The members are angry, determined, and confident that they can win.


26 March 2019

Comments :

This is a disgusting way to treat staff and customers, the Tories have made it ok for businesses to use austerity as an excuse to manipulate workers and reduce hard fought for terms and conditions. It’s up to the staff (with heavy union support) to take action against this. Unfortunately it appears that most or a good portion of younger workers, at least those up to or around the age of 30 are more willing to accept these changes or bow down to pressure from management for fear of losing their jobs or some kind of unpleasant consequence. It’s time for a revolution and it’s up to the unions to educate our younger members from day 1 of joining. Let them know about the past successes of solidarity and educate them in the power of it. If we don’t, we will lose the fight because no one will have any fight in them.

By Vinny on 2019-03-26 21:03:41

I agree about the under 30’s - they have been educated out of standing up against these capitalist monsters. Government after government have done all they can to consolidate this subservience and fear.

By Kris on 2021-02-24 20:10:44


Before Posting

We welcome debate and discussion on our website, but we also want an open, respectful, inclusive space in which forms of abuse or personal attack will not be tolerated. Comments will be moderated and will be removed if they are found to be unduly offensive. You should also be very careful in posting information about your employer. Employers do visit the website and if you think a comment could get you into trouble for releasing confidential or sensitive information, or for bringing the employer into disrepute, please do not post it. It remains your individual responsibility to ensure that what you post is appropriate. Please therefore just give a moment's thought to what you are saying. The types of comments that are likely to be moderated are:

  • Personal abuse or attacks on an individual.
  • Information which breaches another person's right to confidentiality.
  • The use of offensive language, including swear words, or language which is racist, sexist, or otherwise breaches equalities standards.
  • Anything that might place the Branch or the wider union in legal jeopardy.
  • Adverts or information which is posted for commercial gain.

* Name
* Email (will not be published)
* field is required